Also the Color-Image article, and other similar articles (DigitalDog, etc). I read the CinC article a year or two ago, and am familiar with it. It’s on my computer, put there either by MS, HP, or one of the image editing/manipulation programs I have or have had. There is a great article on managing color for printing here: įirst, I’m not currently using Adobe RGB (1998) D65 WP 2.2 Gamma in any of my workflow (as far as I know). My advice is you don’t move anything to System folders. In other words, they generally have a gamma other than 1.0, gamma is simply a tone curve. ICC Profiles usually describe devices, and real devices are never linear. See, there is no doubt I am seriously confused! Should I add the Studio Adobe98.icc to my \System32\spool\drivers\color folder? It’s twice the size of Adobe RGB 1998, so does that indicate that it is somehow better? It looks like the Adobe98.icc profile being used by Studio is in “Program Files (x86)\Topaz Labs\Applications\64Bit\iccprofiles\Adobe98.icc” the size is 1140 bytes, different than the other two.Ī Google search yields the official names is “Adobe 98.icc” (with a space).Īs to the Adobe98.icc profile, I found nothing in the registry, which would seem to indicate that it is hard-coded into the program itself.Īs someone trying to learn how to manage color for printing, I find this to be an extra layer of confusion. In the standard Windows color profile location, I only have “Adobe RGB (1998) D65 WP 2.2 Gamma” and “AdobeRGB1998”. tif, selecting AdobeRGB as the save option when I checked the saved file, it showed only “Adobe98”. Topaz technicians - are you using Adobe RBG (1998) please?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |